What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a Wiki Leaks to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up?
[c:0|t:2|false] INTEGER 99798714058973870184059792986430747502 . [c:0|t:6|false] OBJECT IDENTIFIER 220.127.116.11 (state Or Province Name) . [c:0|t:19|false] Printable String ' Greater Manchester' . As someone interested in digital certificates you will love EV SSL Certificates without the hessle, right? Easy, automated EV SSL Certificates for only € 99 ($ 121 or £ 87). [c:0|t:6|false] OBJECT IDENTIFIER 18.104.22.168 (locality Name) .
[c:0|t:19|false] Printable String ' Salford' .
So why is Wiki Leaks, after performing such an important public service, under such vicious attack?
Because they have outed and embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. Joe Lieberman says Wiki Leaks "has violated the Espionage Act." ** The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal." ** Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders." ** Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... King calls Wiki Leaks a "terrorist organization." And indeed they are!
But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of Wiki Leaks ("they've released little that's new!
") or have painted them as simple anarchists ("Wiki Leaks just releases everything without any editorial control! Wiki Leaks exists, in part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its responsibility.
I am willing to guarantee his return to court with the bail money I have wired to said court.